Tityra

Find the gaps
in how official information
reaches AI agents.

Tityra audits official content delivery for better Agent Experience (AX). Get documented findings and practical recommendations.

Who it helps
Get your free audit

CHECK THE OFFICIAL SOURCE

See what a tested client receives from your website.

KEEP THE PUBLIC CONTEXT

Review eligibility, dates and instructions together.

PLAN THE IMPROVEMENTS

Give publishing and technical teams evidence to act on.

Government & Public Sector

Official information needs to reach the reader.

When someone asks an AI assistant about a public service, its answer may depend on whether the retrieval tool can read the official page. Eligibility details added only by JavaScript may be missing from the initial response. Your team needs to know which information is available and where delivery needs attention.

Ministries and departments

Review the public pages that explain national or regional services, policy and administrative procedures.

Local authorities

Assess council and municipal websites covering local services, applications and public notices.

Public agencies and institutions

Examine programme information, public resources and guidance published by your institution.

Digital and publishing teams

Give IT, web development and content teams a shared view of issues in official information delivery.

What we review

Check access, structure and official context.

Different retrieval tools can receive or interpret a page differently. We assess the agreed pages and checks, documenting observed behaviour and the evidence behind each finding rather than assuming every AI system works in the same way.

Content delivery

Compare the initial HTML with the rendered page. Look for service instructions, eligibility details or deadlines that appear only after JavaScript runs or an interaction takes place.

Discovery and metadata

Review links, page metadata and structured data within the agreed checks. Identify missing or inconsistent signals that make official resources harder to discover or describe.

Structure and accessibility signals

Examine headings, content boundaries, lists, tables and links. Document markup and accessibility issues that can separate an instruction from the information needed to understand it.

Dates, authority and scope

Look for the responsible institution, relevant dates, eligibility conditions and links to supporting guidance. Flag missing or unclear context without interpreting the law or validating policy.

Where AX fits

Start with the information people need.

These are examples of how an agreed assessment can support public-sector publishing. Choose the services, page types and websites relevant to your institution.

  • Government services

    Check whether a client can retrieve the eligibility requirements, application steps and required documents published for a service.

  • Official guidance and regulations

    Investigate technical barriers to retrieving published guidance, including unclear document relationships, dates and links to the official source.

  • Public programmes and announcements

    Examine how programme details, funding criteria, deadlines and updates are delivered. Keep a closing date connected to the programme it describes.

  • Websites across institutions

    Agree a sample across separately authorised websites. Use the findings to distinguish a shared publishing-template issue from a correction needed on an individual page.

Inside the report

Give each finding a clear next step.

Review the affected pages, supporting evidence and recommended changes together. Use the report to prioritise work with the people responsible for the content and the website.

Read the audit methodology

Affected pages and priority

See where an issue was found, its severity and the content included in the assessment.

Recorded observations

Review what was received or displayed under the recorded conditions. Distinguish the observed result from a possible effect on another retrieval tool.

Practical recommendations

Connect each finding to a content, template or delivery change your team can investigate.

A basis for follow-up

Keep the original evidence available when reviewing a change. Request a new audit when you need a subsequent assessment of the website.

Keep the work connected

Organise institutions and websites separately.

Give each institution its own organisation and each website its own project. Colleagues use their own accounts, with access governed by their membership and role in the relevant workspace.

Explore your workspace

Create an account and organisation

A designated colleague signs up and creates an organisation for the ministry, agency or institution. One account can manage multiple organisations, with a separate membership and role in each.

Add websites as projects

A member with project-creation permission creates a project for each website within the selected organisation. Each project has its own audit requests, subject to website authority, scope and any required credit approval.

Review and follow up

When a report is released, authorised colleagues can review findings, evidence and recommendations in the workspace. Record remediation progress and request a new audit after changes when appropriate.

Weekly audit monitoring

All plans

Weekly monitoring automates In-Depth Audits for enabled projects on every workspace plan. Each run uses organisation credits against your approved page budget, up to 100 pages. Pause or resume projects individually.

Weekly reports are delivered after the required checks and credit settlement. Subscription fees and audit credits are separate; Expert Review needs its own approved scope and credit budget.

Set up monitoring

Your audit workspace

Review the evidence behind each finding, discuss what to fix with your team and track progress across projects.

Integrates with the tools you already use

Developer tools

Tityra workspace showing a website content audit report, findings and resources in scope.

Choose your workspace

Billing period

StarterGet started with your team

Free

Free workspace

Initial Audit: Free
Up to 10 pages

  • 2 team members
  • Weekly scheduling using credits
Additional audits use purchased credits.
How are additional audits charged??After your free Initial Audit, each additional audit costs 19 credits (£19 including VAT) for up to 100 pages, charged only with your approval. Expert Review is priced separately.

ProFor growing teams

£59

per month, excluding VAT

5 In-Depth Audits / month
Up to 100 pages per audit

  • 10 team members
  • All integrations
  • Weekly scheduling using your allowance or credits
Additional audits use purchased credits.
How are additional audits charged??After your 5 included monthly audits, each additional audit costs 19 credits (£19 including VAT) for up to 100 pages, charged only with your approval. Expert Review is priced separately.

EnterpriseFor larger teams

£199

per month, excluding VAT

20 In-Depth Audits / month
Up to 100 pages per audit

  • Unlimited team members
  • All integrations
  • Weekly scheduling using your allowance or credits
  • Custom PDF report branding
Additional audits use purchased credits.
How are additional audits charged??After your 20 included monthly audits, each additional audit costs 19 credits (£19 including VAT) for up to 100 pages, charged only with your approval. Expert Review is priced separately.

Questions public-sector teams ask.

Have a different question about your website?

Talk to us
How can we start with a limited assessment?

Choose an agreed sample of public pages, such as a service description, its eligibility guidance and application instructions. Create an account to request an audit or contact our team to discuss the scope. The person requesting it must be authorised to have the website assessed, and we confirm the scope before work begins.

Will this make AI assistants give accurate answers?

Tityra can identify and document problems in the content delivered by your website. It cannot control which sources a third-party AI system retrieves or how it uses them, so the audit cannot guarantee accurate answers, citations or search visibility.

Does the audit certify accessibility or regulatory compliance?

No. We review accessibility signals and other agreed content checks, with evidence and practical recommendations. This is not a full accessibility conformance assessment, a legal review, a security assessment or government certification.

Can we manage several institutions and websites?

Yes. An account can belong to multiple organisations, and each organisation can contain separate website projects within its plan limits. Access depends on the membership and permissions in each organisation and project. Membership of one institution does not give access to another.

Can you assess restricted services or private records?

Start with public information you are authorised to have reviewed. Contact us before proposing a restricted resource so we can agree what can be assessed. Do not submit passwords, private citizen records or other confidential information with an enquiry.

What happens after our team makes a change?

Record remediation progress alongside the finding and keep the original evidence available for comparison. You can request a new audit of the relevant website when a subsequent assessment is needed; the original report does not automatically verify a fix.